University Study Suggests Food Stamp Ban on Soda

University Study Suggests Food Stamp Ban on Soda


alg_ny_food_stampIn a study by both Stanford University and the University of California at San Francisco, researchers determined that a change in food stamp policy could lower the risk for obesity.

The study was based on two proposed changes to the SNAP program. Researchers considered how two different measures would impact the buying habits of food stamp participants. One proposed change in policy was a complete ban of sugar-sweetened beverages. The other was a discount on the purchase of fruits and vegetables.

The study is based on the theory that the over-consumption of sugar is a main cause of obesity.  They hoped to prove that policies restricting sugar consumption would directly impact obesity and obesity related diseases.

Sponsored Links

One doctor has made statements supporting this theory. Dr. Robert Lustig, a pediatric neuroendocrinologist, calls sugar a poison that causes harmful effects on our bodies. He explains:

“… when it comes to harmful health effects, sugar is worse than fat. Consumption of either results in elevated levels of artery-clogging fats being made by the liver and deposited in the bloodstream. But fructose causes even further damage to the liver and to structural proteins of the body while fomenting excessive caloric consumption.”

While critics question whether common foods such as soda should be blamed for obesity, researchers were able to determine a connection.

Their results revealed that if food stamp policy changes were made to ban sugar, participants would experience weight loss.

While many buyers would likely switch to the purchase of fruit juice rather than soda, there would still be some reduction in calories and a noticeable reduction in sugar. Researchers estimate an average loss of 1.5 pounds and a 1.7% reduction in Type 2 diabetes.

This is compared to the result achieved if policies were put into effect to increase the purchase of fruits and vegetables. While that policy would likely increase the amount of people who ate the recommended intake of fruits and vegetables, it did not have any effect on obesity or diabetes.

The Center for Disease Control reports that more than one-third of Americans are obese and are at risk for obesity related conditions. They also report that obesity is more common among low-income women.

More News

It has been a lowly day for U.S. treasuries, as the stock market gained momentum in the morning session. The three major stock indexes opened on a higher note after positive quarterly results from Morgan Stanley. During the day’s...
A team of biologists from the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel in Germany, with the help of English and American colleagues, have come across a bizarre reproductive pattern in vampire squids. New evidence has shown that vampire squids living...
It has been a monotonous day for U.S. bonds with minimal bond activity after a strong morning start from all of the primary U.S. stock markets. Bonds are trading flat after covering up for the losses incurred yesterday. Another...
Three commonly used insecticides pose a severe risk to honey bee populations and the food chain in general. According to recent field studies, neonicotinoids impact reproduction and colony growth in some bee species. Furthermore, bees instead of avoiding these...
Earth Day is celebrated worldwide every year on April 22nd with the aim to promote environmental awareness and call for the protection of our planet. On this year Earth Day’s 45th anniversary, 17 world-leading scientists launched the Earth Statement, which is believed to...