University Study Suggests Food Stamp Ban on Soda

University Study Suggests Food Stamp Ban on Soda


alg_ny_food_stampIn a study by both Stanford University and the University of California at San Francisco, researchers determined that a change in food stamp policy could lower the risk for obesity.

The study was based on two proposed changes to the SNAP program. Researchers considered how two different measures would impact the buying habits of food stamp participants. One proposed change in policy was a complete ban of sugar-sweetened beverages. The other was a discount on the purchase of fruits and vegetables.

The study is based on the theory that the over-consumption of sugar is a main cause of obesity.  They hoped to prove that policies restricting sugar consumption would directly impact obesity and obesity related diseases.

Sponsored Links

One doctor has made statements supporting this theory. Dr. Robert Lustig, a pediatric neuroendocrinologist, calls sugar a poison that causes harmful effects on our bodies. He explains:

“… when it comes to harmful health effects, sugar is worse than fat. Consumption of either results in elevated levels of artery-clogging fats being made by the liver and deposited in the bloodstream. But fructose causes even further damage to the liver and to structural proteins of the body while fomenting excessive caloric consumption.”

While critics question whether common foods such as soda should be blamed for obesity, researchers were able to determine a connection.

Their results revealed that if food stamp policy changes were made to ban sugar, participants would experience weight loss.

While many buyers would likely switch to the purchase of fruit juice rather than soda, there would still be some reduction in calories and a noticeable reduction in sugar. Researchers estimate an average loss of 1.5 pounds and a 1.7% reduction in Type 2 diabetes.

This is compared to the result achieved if policies were put into effect to increase the purchase of fruits and vegetables. While that policy would likely increase the amount of people who ate the recommended intake of fruits and vegetables, it did not have any effect on obesity or diabetes.

The Center for Disease Control reports that more than one-third of Americans are obese and are at risk for obesity related conditions. They also report that obesity is more common among low-income women.

More News

The signs of an improving economy are more visible now with a string of improving economic data including a drop in U.S. jobless claims. The U.S. labor market is at its lowest jobless claims’ standard since November 1973 with...
It has been a happening day in the mortgage market with interest rates falling to their lowest level in the past two weeks. The drop is influenced by a basket of reasons starting with the steady improvement in the...
Ever since the Apple Watch went on sale in April, the sales figure of the device has often been the topic of discussion among tech lovers. Many analysts have come forward to provide an estimate of the total sales...
The OnePlus One was the flagship killer of 2014, offering the best specs that one would find in a sub-$400 smartphone. Now, it's time for the second generation model, and the new OnePlus 2 will debut later today internationally....
Today’s U.S. single-family home data came in weaker than expectations with new single-family home sales declining in June. According to the Commerce Department, new single-family houses had their worst selling month in the last seven months with a drop...